This high-level SEO audit for Current.com provides detailed information on the on and off-site performance of Current.com, an alternative online bank.
|Duplicate Title Tags||61|
|Missing Title Tags||0|
|Title Tags >60 Characters||72|
|Title Tags <30 Characters||13|
|Multiple Title Tags||0|
|Missing Meta Descriptions||9|
|Duplicate Meta Descriptions||46|
|Meta Descriptions >155 Characters||19|
|Meta Descriptions <70 Characters||11|
|Missing H1 Tags||3|
|Duplicate H1 Tags||0|
|Multiple H1 Tags||147|
|Missing Alt Text||5|
Current.com IS currently using Structured Data Markup (SDM) on some of their pages. This can be helpful at increase overall real estate and exposure of a given SERP, improving click-through-rates for results and push down competitors. We regularly recommend SDM.
Mobile Speed Test
Desktop Speed Test
Page Load Speed
Load Performance Grade
High level, automated suggestions for improving load speed on Current.com
|Reduce DNS Lookups|
|Compress Components with GZIP|
|Use Cookie-Free Domains|
|Add Expires Headers|
|Avoid URL Redirects|
|Make Fewer HTTPS Requests|
|Avoid Empty SRC or Href|
Like what you are seeing here? This is only the beginning. With a comprehensive website audit from SEO.co, we perform a deeper dive into your on-site issues, backlink profile and give you enhanced recommendations for dominating your competition.
|Keyword||Volume||Monthly Traffic||Est. Value|
|mobile check deposit||3,700||464||$1,879|
|get paid 2 days early||100||368||$1,439|
|How long does direct deposit take||3,400||203||$809|
|How to deposit check||900||94||$607|
|direct deposit time||600||78||$494|
|no overdraft fees||300||92||$492|
Further audit recommendations based on the findings of this high-level audit
Compared to our last high-level audit for Pluralsight, the data and statistics here look much better. However, it will be important to consider that Current.com only has 242 indexed pages in Google while Pluralsight has more than 28,000. Avoiding blank or duplicate title tags becomes much more difficult as the total volume of content begins to scale.
Hence, when it comes to comparing apples to apples in SEO audits, it is often best to compare the relative percentage of errors relative to the competition, so webmasters can at least be prepared to improve on-site and off-site elements to perform at par or better than the next best alternative. Such is the case with Current.com.